Citroen C3 MOT Results
Registered in 201679.0% pass rate
from 9,059 tests in 2021
(29% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 is unusually good or bad.
-
8.0% fail on
Visibility
(100% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.022% fail on Windscreen
-
0.022% fail on
View to rear
- 0.022% fail on Mirrors
-
6.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(72% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Direction indicators
(74% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Flashing type
(74% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Individual direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.055% fail on All direction indicators (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Flashing type
(74% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.13% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.13% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.066% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.011% fail on Reversing lamp switch
-
0.011% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.011% fail on Position lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth (35% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Size/type
-
2.6% fail on
Brakes
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(24% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads (24% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Brake linings
-
0.92% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(92% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Brake discs (92% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(24% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.44% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
- 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.066% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.011% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.011% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.088% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.077% fail on
Rbt
- 0.077% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.011% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.011% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.077% fail on
Rbt
-
0.066% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.066% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.055% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.022% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.066% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.011% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.44% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.11% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Hand lever
-
0.044% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.044% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.033% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.033% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.033% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.011% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.022% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.011% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.011% fail on Lever
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Exhaust system (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Transmission
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Belts
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Undertray
- 0.022% fail on Bumpers
-
0.011% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.011% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.011% fail on
Chassis
- 0.011% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.011% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.011% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.011% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.011% fail on Bracket
-
0.82% fail on
Suspension
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Springs
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Coil springs
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Coil spring (59% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Coil springs
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension arms
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Ball joint
- 0.077% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.099% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.033% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.022% fail on Ball joint
- 0.022% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.011% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.011% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.044% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.033% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.022% fail on Ball joint
- 0.011% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.022% fail on Shock absorbers (84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.46% fail on
Springs
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.73% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.38% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.055% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.011% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.011% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
0.35% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.12% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.022% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.38% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.033% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.033% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.73% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.33% fail on
Steering
-
0.32% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.31% fail on Track rod end
- 0.011% fail on Ball joint
- 0.011% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.32% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.20% fail on Condition
- 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.033% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.13% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.099% fail on Attachment
- 0.033% fail on Condition
-
0.077% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Registration plates (64% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C3 (2010 - 2017)
Neat styling. The 1.6 HDi is a decent all-rounder. Excellent ride.