Citroen C3 MOT Results
Registered in 200551.0% pass rate
from 8,302 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(45% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Headlamps
(60% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Headlamp (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Headlamp levelling device (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Dipswitch
-
7.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Flashing type
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.36% fail on All direction indicators (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Flashing type
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(43% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp (21% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(45% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(45% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(45% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.33% fail on Horn
- 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.024% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.26% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.26% fail on Position lamp
- 0.024% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.024% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.024% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.012% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.012% fail on Switch
-
8.3% fail on
Headlamps
(60% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(22% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.2% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Suspension arm (85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
6.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(17% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.63% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Linkage (69% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (89% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
6.1% fail on
Springs
(31% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Coil springs
(30% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Coil spring (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Mounting
- 0.060% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.012% fail on
Bonded suspension units
- 0.012% fail on Bonded suspension unit
-
6.0% fail on
Coil springs
(30% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.60% fail on
Other suspension component
(54% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.036% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers (43% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.036% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.024% fail on Ball joint
-
0.16% fail on
Sub-frames
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.024% fail on Sub-frame (90% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint
-
0.012% fail on
Axles
- 0.012% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension arms
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(22% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Transmission
-
3.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.2% fail on Joints
- 0.024% fail on Flexible couplings
- 0.012% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.072% fail on
Prop shafts
(64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Joints
-
3.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Doors
-
0.42% fail on
Other passenger's door
(72% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Door condition (65% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Catch (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.20% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.084% fail on Door condition
- 0.012% fail on Catch
- 0.012% fail on Hinge
-
0.42% fail on
Other passenger's door
(72% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Chassis
- 0.40% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.26% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.18% fail on
Body
- 0.11% fail on Other body component
- 0.048% fail on Panel
- 0.024% fail on Body condition
-
0.16% fail on
Fuel system
(66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Pipe
- 0.048% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Tank
- 0.012% fail on Hose
- 0.012% fail on System
- 0.12% fail on Bumpers
-
0.096% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.072% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.024% fail on Bracket
-
0.048% fail on
Cabs
- 0.048% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.048% fail on Undertray
- 0.012% fail on Floor
-
0.012% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.012% fail on Other boot lid component
-
9.9% fail on
Brakes
(26% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
(25% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Service brake performance
(20% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
(20% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.060% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.048% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
(20% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(59% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Rbt
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Parking brake performance (33% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.012% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.024% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.012% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.012% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.00% fail on
Rbt
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(29% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (54% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.012% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Service brake performance
(20% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(45% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.67% fail on Electronic stability control (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Electronic braking system
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
- 0.024% fail on Brake drums
-
0.94% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Brake pads (55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Brake linings
-
0.036% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Rod
- 0.012% fail on Cable
- 0.012% fail on Lever
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.67% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(46% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Hand lever
- 0.28% fail on Pedal
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.40% fail on Lever
- 0.012% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 0.29% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.060% fail on Valves (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses (56% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.024% fail on Leaks
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
(25% better than other 2005 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Visibility
(23% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Wipers (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Washers
-
0.25% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.23% fail on Windscreen
- 0.024% fail on Window
- 0.24% fail on Bonnet
-
0.24% fail on
View to rear
- 0.23% fail on Mirrors
- 0.012% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.012% fail on Driver's view
-
7.4% fail on
Tyres
(15% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Size/type
-
6.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.024% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.012% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.012% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.012% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.94% fail on
Compression ignition
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.024% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.012% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.012% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.012% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
5.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.49% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.096% fail on Other leaks
- 0.048% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.024% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.024% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.012% fail on Sound deadening material
- 0.012% fail on Undertray
-
6.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(28% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Condition
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
- 0.012% fail on Requirements
- 0.42% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Airbags
- 0.012% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
(26% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(24% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end (22% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.024% fail on Drag link end
- 0.012% fail on Locking devices
-
0.42% fail on
Steering gear
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Steering rack (40% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Operation
-
0.16% fail on
Power steering
- 0.16% fail on Operation
- 0.072% fail on Steering wheel (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Steering play
- 0.060% fail on Steering rack
- 0.048% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.024% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.012% fail on Steering column
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(24% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.47% fail on Registration plates
-
0.13% fail on
Road Wheels
(73% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Attachment (75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Condition
-
0.024% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.012% fail on Anchorages
- 0.012% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C3 (2002 - 2010)
Clever design for the boot floor. Four-star crash test rating. Good balance of ride comfort and roadholding.