MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » C3 Picasso » 2017

Citroen C3 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2017
79.6% pass rate
from 3,306 tests in 2021
(59% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.7% fail on Visibility (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Wipers (170% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on View to rear
      • 0.030% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Individual direction indicators (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.030% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.030% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.030% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.76% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Brakes
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.82% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.82% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.36% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.030% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.030% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.030% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.091% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.030% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.030% fail on Reservoirs
  • 0.97% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Exhaust system (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.030% fail on Pipe
    • 0.030% fail on Doors
      • 0.030% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.030% fail on Door condition
  • 0.42% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.39% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.21% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.091% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.060% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.030% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.18% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.030% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.030% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.27% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.24% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.030% fail on Requirements
    • 0.030% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.21% fail on Suspension (76% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.060% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.030% fail on Springs
      • 0.030% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.030% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.030% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.030% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.030% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.091% fail on Steering
    • 0.060% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.060% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.030% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.030% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.091% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 0.030% fail on Condition
  • 0.060% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.060% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.030% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.030% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages