Citroen C3 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2016

79.8% pass rate

from 2,006 tests in 2021

(26% worse than other 2016 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

6.5% fail on Visibility (65% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Wipers (64% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Washers (61% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.100% fail on View to rear
  - 0.100% fail on Mirrors
- 0.050% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.050% fail on Windscreen
6.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (78% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Headlamp (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.60% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.60% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.50% fail on Individual direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.050% fail on All direction indicators
    - 0.050% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.35% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.20% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.100% fail on Horn
  - 0.050% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  - 0.050% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.100% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.100% fail on Position lamp
4.4% fail on Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Condition (72% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Tread depth (56% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Size/type
2.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Transmission (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 1.6% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.050% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.050% fail on Joints
- 0.90% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.050% fail on Pipe
- 0.050% fail on Doors
  - 0.050% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.050% fail on Catch
2.1% fail on Brakes
- 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.85% fail on Brake linings and pads (47% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.85% fail on Brake pads (46% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.85% fail on Brake discs
- 0.35% fail on Brake performance
  - 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.35% fail on Rbt
      - 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.100% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.25% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.100% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.050% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.050% fail on Pedal
- 0.050% fail on Rigid brake pipes
0.45% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 0.40% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.20% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.050% fail on Catalyst emissions
  - 0.20% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.100% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    - 0.100% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.050% fail on Noise suppression
  - 0.050% fail on Sound deadening material
0.40% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.40% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.40% fail on Condition
0.20% fail on Suspension (90% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.20% fail on Ball joint
0.20% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.050% fail on Attachment
0.050% fail on Steering
- 0.050% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.050% fail on Track rod end