Citroen C3 Picasso MOT Results
Registered in 201173.2% pass rate
from 6,411 tests in 2017
(8.4% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 Picasso is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (26% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(39% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp (45% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.016% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.016% fail on Dipswitch
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (41% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Position lamps
(26% better than other 2011 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Front lamps
- 0.078% fail on Rear lamps (80% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.031% fail on All position lamps
-
0.75% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.75% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.59% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.047% fail on Side repeaters (90% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.19% fail on Horn
-
0.094% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(68% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Fog lamp (67% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Tell tale
- 0.078% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.016% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.016% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.016% fail on Lamp
-
7.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Exhaust system (11 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.031% fail on System
- 0.016% fail on Pipe
- 0.016% fail on Cap
- 0.016% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.9% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 0.047% fail on Valve stem
- 0.016% fail on Size/type
-
5.1% fail on
Brakes
-
3.6% fail on
Hub components
(37% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs (200% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.0% fail on
Brake performance
(31% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Front wheels
- 0.31% fail on Rear wheels (55% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Brake operation
- 0.016% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.42% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.41% fail on
Components
- 0.30% fail on Hoses (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Reservoirs (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Pipes (81% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Operation
- 0.016% fail on Leaks
-
0.41% fail on
Components
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake control components
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Anti-slip (180% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.16% fail on ABS
- 0.047% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.031% fail on
Parking brake
(89% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2011 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Hub components
(37% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.5% fail on Washers (62% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Wipers (37% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Windscreen
- 0.16% fail on Mirrors
-
2.9% fail on
Suspension
(47% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.86% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.031% fail on Attachment
- 0.016% fail on Condition
-
0.89% fail on
Drive shafts
(68% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Front drive shafts
(70% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Constant velocity joints (69% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Couplings
-
0.89% fail on
Front drive shafts
(70% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Coil springs
(84% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.20% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.14% fail on Front
- 0.062% fail on Rear
-
0.19% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(70% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (74% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.016% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.11% fail on
Shock absorbers
(87% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.047% fail on Condition
-
0.89% fail on
Suspension arms
-
0.97% fail on
Steering
(75% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Steering system
- 0.44% fail on Track rod end
- 0.094% fail on Ball joint
- 0.078% fail on Steering rack
- 0.031% fail on Steering arm
-
0.016% fail on
Free play
- 0.016% fail on Steering rack
-
0.30% fail on
Power steering
(5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Electronic power steering (15 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Steering operation (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Steering system
-
0.28% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.016% fail on Requirements
-
0.094% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.078% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.016% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.27% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.27% fail on Registration plate
-
0.23% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.11% fail on Body condition
-
0.094% fail on
Doors
- 0.062% fail on Passengers other
- 0.031% fail on Passengers front
- 0.016% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.016% fail on
Seats
- 0.016% fail on Drivers
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.094% fail on Attachment
- 0.078% fail on Condition