Citroen C3 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.1% pass rate
from 74 tests in 2020
(14% worse than other 2010 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (3.4% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Compression ignition (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.8% fail on Brakes (13% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pedal (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
  • 6.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 1.4% fail on Other body component
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres (5.5% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.4% fail on Steering (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Visibility (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Suspension (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint

Search Good Garages