MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » C3 Picasso » 2010

Citroen C3 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2010
64.4% pass rate
from 8,337 tests in 2017
(18% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Front lamps (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear lamps (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Switch
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual lamps (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.084% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.036% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.012% fail on Switch
    • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.060% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Battery
    • 0.012% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.012% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.012% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.7% fail on Suspension
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.024% fail on Condition
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (28% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
    • 0.91% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Rear
    • 0.90% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.86% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.86% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.036% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.036% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.61% fail on Coil springs (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Location
    • 0.54% fail on Front suspension joints (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.012% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 6.4% fail on Brakes (14% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Hub components (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.54% fail on Rear wheels (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.036% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.012% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Components
        • 0.31% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Pipes (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.012% fail on Leaks
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on ABS (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.060% fail on Parking brake (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.096% fail on Size/type
    • 0.072% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Emissions
    • 0.072% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.060% fail on Fuel system (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on System
      • 0.012% fail on Tank
  • 4.4% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Steering system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.060% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.024% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.012% fail on Free play
        • 0.012% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.012% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.072% fail on Power steering
      • 0.048% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
    • 0.036% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.012% fail on Steering control
      • 0.012% fail on Steering wheel
  • 4.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers (32% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.43% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.36% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.012% fail on Requirements
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
      • 0.012% fail on Installation check
        • 0.012% fail on Belt(s)/padding
      • 0.012% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.072% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.36% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.23% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.18% fail on Body condition
    • 0.036% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.012% fail on Doors
      • 0.012% fail on Passengers front
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages