Citroen C3 Picasso MOT Results
Registered in 201064.4% pass rate
from 8,337 tests in 2017
(18% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 Picasso is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(31% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Stop lamp (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Position lamps
(22% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Front lamps (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Rear lamps (36% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on All position lamps
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
(23% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Switch
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Individual lamps (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.084% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Tell tales
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.34% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.34% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.036% fail on Tell tale
- 0.012% fail on Switch
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.060% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Battery
- 0.012% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.012% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.012% fail on Rear reflectors
-
7.7% fail on
Suspension
-
3.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.024% fail on Condition
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(25% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (28% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
-
0.91% fail on
Wheel bearings
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Rear
-
0.90% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.86% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.86% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.036% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.036% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.86% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.61% fail on
Coil springs
(81% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Location
- 0.54% fail on Front suspension joints (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Shock absorbers
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.012% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Brakes
(14% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Hub components
(54% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Brake pads (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake performance
(36% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Front wheels
- 0.54% fail on Rear wheels (48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.036% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.012% fail on Brake operation
-
0.44% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.43% fail on
Components
- 0.31% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Pipes (76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.012% fail on Leaks
-
0.43% fail on
Components
-
0.40% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Condition
-
0.40% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on ABS (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.060% fail on
Parking brake
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Hub components
(54% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.096% fail on Size/type
- 0.072% fail on Valve stem
-
5.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Emissions
- 0.072% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.060% fail on
Fuel system
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.048% fail on System
- 0.012% fail on Tank
-
4.4% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.060% fail on Steering rack
- 0.024% fail on Drag link end
-
0.012% fail on
Free play
- 0.012% fail on Steering rack
- 0.012% fail on Steering arm
-
0.072% fail on
Power steering
- 0.048% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Operation
- 0.036% fail on Steering operation
-
0.012% fail on
Steering control
- 0.012% fail on Steering wheel
-
4.3% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.3% fail on Washers (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Wipers (32% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Windscreen
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
0.43% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.36% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.32% fail on Condition
- 0.012% fail on Requirements
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
-
0.012% fail on
Installation check
- 0.012% fail on Belt(s)/padding
- 0.012% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.072% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.060% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.36% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.36% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.36% fail on Registration plate
-
0.23% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.18% fail on Body condition
- 0.036% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.012% fail on
Doors
- 0.012% fail on Passengers front
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment