MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » C2 » 2010

Citroen C2 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
53.2% pass rate
from 363 tests in 2021
(29% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.2% fail on Springs
      • 5.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.2% fail on Coil spring
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.4% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.28% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Direction indicators (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Flashing type (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Hazard warning (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.55% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.28% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.28% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.28% fail on Joints
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.28% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.28% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.28% fail on Carrier
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.28% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.28% fail on Hinge
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Driver's view
  • 8.3% fail on Brakes
    • 5.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.55% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.55% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.83% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.55% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.28% fail on Lever
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.28% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.28% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.83% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.28% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.83% fail on Steering
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.28% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.28% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.28% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages