Citroen C2 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
56.0% pass rate
from 430 tests in 2020
(32% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Transmission (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 14% fail on Drive shafts (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 14% fail on Joints (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Prop shafts (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Joints (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Front passenger's door (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.23% fail on Hinge
    • 0.47% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.23% fail on Chassis
      • 0.23% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Load security
      • 0.23% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.23% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.23% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.47% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.23% fail on Horn
    • 0.23% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 4.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Springs (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Coil spring (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.23% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.8% fail on Brakes
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.93% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt
          • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake discs (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.93% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.23% fail on Cable
    • 0.93% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.93% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.47% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.47% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.70% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.47% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.23% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.47% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.70% fail on Steering
    • 0.23% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.23% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.23% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.23% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.23% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages