Citroen C2 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.1% pass rate
from 392 tests in 2017
(58% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 20% fail on Drive shafts (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 20% fail on Front drive shafts (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 20% fail on Constant velocity joints (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.51% fail on Tie bars/rods (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.26% fail on Front
      • 0.26% fail on Rear
    • 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Stop lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.6% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.51% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Fog lamp
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust system (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Emissions
    • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.6% fail on Brakes
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.77% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.51% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components
      • 0.77% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.51% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.51% fail on Components
        • 0.51% fail on Hoses
    • 0.51% fail on ABS
  • 0.77% fail on Steering
    • 0.51% fail on Steering system
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.26% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
  • 0.77% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.77% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.77% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.77% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.77% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.77% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.77% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Passengers front (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages