MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » C2 » 2009

Citroen C2 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.1% pass rate
from 3,330 tests in 2017
(40% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 18% fail on Drive shafts (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 18% fail on Front drive shafts (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 18% fail on Constant velocity joints (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Couplings
      • 0.090% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.030% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
      • 0.030% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Coil springs (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Location (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Rear (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.030% fail on General condition
    • 0.030% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.030% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.030% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.030% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.030% fail on Axles
      • 0.030% fail on Axle beam
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Stop lamp (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.78% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.030% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.030% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.21% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Battery
    • 0.060% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.060% fail on Switch
    • 0.060% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.030% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.030% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.060% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
    • 0.060% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.0% fail on Brakes
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.090% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.060% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Components (59% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pipes (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Hoses
        • 0.030% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.030% fail on Operation
      • 0.030% fail on Leaks
    • 0.30% fail on ABS
    • 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
        • 0.090% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.030% fail on Condition
    • 0.090% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 6.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Emissions
    • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.060% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.060% fail on Cap
  • 0.81% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Drivers
    • 0.24% fail on Seats (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.030% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.030% fail on Chassis
    • 0.030% fail on Body security
  • 0.78% fail on Steering
    • 0.45% fail on Steering system (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Free play
        • 0.060% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.27% fail on Steering control (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering column (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering wheel (37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Power steering
      • 0.060% fail on Operation
      • 0.030% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.66% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.42% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.33% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.090% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.030% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 0.27% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
      • 0.030% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.60% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.090% fail on Condition
    • 0.090% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages