Citroen C2 MOT Results
Registered in 200854.0% pass rate
from 3,007 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C2 is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(24% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Springs
-
6.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.8% fail on Coil spring
- 0.033% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
6.8% fail on
Coil springs
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(35% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (30% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.100% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.067% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (55% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.90% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.76% fail on Ball joint (80% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.067% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.067% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.033% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.033% fail on Linkage
- 0.033% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Macpherson strut
(150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.067% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.067% fail on Ball joint (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
- 0.100% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.067% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.40% fail on Shock absorbers (60% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.17% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.033% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.033% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.033% fail on Ball joint
-
6.8% fail on
Springs
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Flexible couplings (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.23% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.23% fail on Joints
-
8.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust system (55% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Chassis
- 0.23% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.17% fail on
Spare wheel
(14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Carrier (23 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.17% fail on
Body
- 0.13% fail on Other body component
- 0.033% fail on Panel
-
0.17% fail on
Doors
-
0.100% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.100% fail on Door condition
-
0.067% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.067% fail on Door condition
-
0.100% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.100% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.067% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.033% fail on Pipe
-
0.067% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.033% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.033% fail on Bracket
-
0.067% fail on
Seats
- 0.067% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.033% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.067% fail on
Cabs
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Undertray
-
8.9% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(64% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
(64% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
(64% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.033% fail on Dipswitch
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.80% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.80% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.80% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.33% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.20% fail on Horn
- 0.100% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.033% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.30% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.27% fail on Position lamp
- 0.033% fail on All position lamps
-
0.033% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.033% fail on Switch
-
0.033% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.033% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.033% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
10% fail on
Brakes
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
(28% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(70% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
(72% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (81% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.067% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (42 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.033% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
(72% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.100% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.067% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
0.53% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(70% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(88% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Brake discs (90% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(52% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads (52% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.13% fail on Cable
-
2.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(88% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Parking brake control
(97% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Lever (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.63% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.033% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.57% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.33% fail on Hand lever
- 0.23% fail on Pedal
-
0.100% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.067% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.033% fail on Valves
- 0.100% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.067% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.033% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.033% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.033% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.033% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.033% fail on Other components
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
(28% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
(45% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Wipers (70% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Washers (36% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
View to rear
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
-
0.17% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.17% fail on Windscreen
- 0.067% fail on Bonnet
-
7.3% fail on
Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 0.33% fail on Size/type
-
4.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (36% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.067% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.76% fail on
Compression ignition
(52% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.23% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.067% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.067% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.53% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.50% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.033% fail on Other leaks
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Condition
- 0.033% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.76% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.033% fail on
Airbags
- 0.033% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Steering
(34% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.67% fail on Steering rack
-
0.53% fail on
Steering linkage components
(74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Drag link end
- 0.033% fail on Ball joint
-
0.27% fail on
Power steering
- 0.27% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Steering wheel (28 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.100% fail on
Steering play
- 0.100% fail on Steering rack
- 0.100% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.67% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.50% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.50% fail on Registration plates
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.100% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C2 (2003 - 2010)
Low running costs, including insurance. Good crash test rating.