Citroen C2 MOT Results
Registered in 200654.8% pass rate
from 6,615 tests in 2017
(7.1% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C2 is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(18% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (52% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(160% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Flashing type
(160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.0% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (61% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Switch
-
6.5% fail on
Flashing type
(160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp (19% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Position lamps
(21% better than other 2006 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Front lamps
- 0.48% fail on Rear lamps (64% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.015% fail on All position lamps
- 0.015% fail on Switch
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2006 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
-
0.015% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.015% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.015% fail on Switch
- 0.015% fail on Dipswitch
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(38% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.30% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Tell tale (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Battery
- 0.57% fail on Horn
- 0.060% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.060% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.045% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.030% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.030% fail on Switch
- 0.015% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
5.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(36% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (44% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.045% fail on Condition
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
-
4.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(21% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (25% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Attachment
- 0.045% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Coil springs
(16% better than other 2006 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Condition (19% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Location (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
(84% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Rear
-
2.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(31% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(32% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (31% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.060% fail on Drive shafts
-
1.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(32% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
0.60% fail on
Macpherson strut
(190% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.21% fail on Component mounting
- 0.12% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.015% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.17% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.076% fail on General condition (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.045% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.045% fail on
Sub-frames
(74% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Condition
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
-
0.045% fail on
Axles
- 0.045% fail on Clearance (68 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.015% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.015% fail on Condition
-
5.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(36% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
(30% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Rear wheels (67% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Front wheels (28% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.060% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.060% fail on Brake operation
- 0.060% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
(24% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs (57% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake
(130% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.3% fail on ABS (82% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(76% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Components
(80% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Hoses (48% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pipes (94% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.030% fail on Cylinders
- 0.015% fail on Servos
- 0.015% fail on Pump
- 0.17% fail on Leaks
- 0.045% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
0.54% fail on
Components
(80% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Restricted movement (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.27% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Pedal
- 0.21% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.091% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.060% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Cable (79% better than other 2006 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
(30% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(41% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Wipers (73% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 0.60% fail on Windscreen
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
- 0.091% fail on Bonnet
- 0.015% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
9.2% fail on
Tyres
- 6.0% fail on Tread depth (21% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Size/type
- 0.12% fail on Valve stem
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(55% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Emissions (45% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.12% fail on
Fuel system
(73% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.076% fail on System
- 0.030% fail on Cap (83% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Tank
-
2.6% fail on
Steering
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
(28% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (41% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint (74% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Steering rack
- 0.076% fail on Steering arm
-
0.060% fail on
Free play
- 0.060% fail on Steering rack
-
0.015% fail on
Other components
- 0.015% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.33% fail on
Power steering
- 0.29% fail on Operation (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.015% fail on Drive system
-
0.21% fail on
Steering control
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Steering column (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Steering wheel (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
(28% better than other 2006 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
(41% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Condition
- 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas (66% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Requirements
- 0.030% fail on Attachment
-
0.94% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.82% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.015% fail on Passengers airbag
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
(41% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.41% fail on Body condition
-
0.30% fail on
Doors
- 0.21% fail on Passengers front (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Drivers
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
- 0.12% fail on Drivers
- 0.076% fail on Passengers
-
0.17% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.17% fail on Chassis
- 0.11% fail on Body security (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.030% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.015% fail on Speedometer
-
0.77% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.77% fail on Registration plate
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Attachment (56% better than other 2006 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C2 (2003 - 2010)
Low running costs, including insurance. Good crash test rating.