Citroen C2 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.7% pass rate
from 7,777 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Individual lamps (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Switch
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps (20% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Front lamps (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Rear lamps (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp (24% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (23% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.013% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.013% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.013% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.013% fail on Switch
    • 1.8% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Battery (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.013% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.051% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 22% fail on Suspension (17% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (57% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.013% fail on Condition
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment
    • 5.5% fail on Coil springs
      • 5.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Location (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms (16% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (20% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment
      • 0.026% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.013% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.039% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.039% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Shock absorbers (35% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Prescribed areas (33% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Component mounting (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.013% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.039% fail on General condition (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Trailing arms (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (86% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.026% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.026% fail on Sub-frames (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Condition
    • 0.013% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.013% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.7% fail on Brake performance (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Rear wheels (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Front wheels (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.051% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components (20% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (45% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.051% fail on Wheel cylinder (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on ABS (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Components (71% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Hoses
        • 0.19% fail on Pipes (93% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Cylinders (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.026% fail on Pump (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.077% fail on Operation
    • 0.53% fail on Electronic stability system (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.24% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.090% fail on Condition
    • 0.013% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.013% fail on Cable
  • 10.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.72% fail on Windscreen (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.21% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres (11% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Tread depth (24% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type
    • 0.17% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (24% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Emissions
    • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Cap
      • 0.051% fail on System (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Tank
  • 3.2% fail on Steering (20% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Steering system (22% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end (22% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.064% fail on Free play
        • 0.064% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.026% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.026% fail on Other components
        • 0.026% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Operation (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.013% fail on Drive system
    • 0.17% fail on Steering operation (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Steering control
      • 0.026% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.013% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.013% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.013% fail on Universal joint
  • 2.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Prescribed areas (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment
      • 0.026% fail on Installation check
        • 0.026% fail on Belt(s)/padding (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Requirements
    • 0.62% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.55% fail on Doors
      • 0.42% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
      • 0.013% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.46% fail on Body condition
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mountings (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
      • 0.039% fail on Passengers
    • 0.10% fail on Body security (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on Vehicle structure (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Chassis (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on Load security
      • 0.026% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.013% fail on Access panel
  • 0.86% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.86% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages