Citroen C2 MOT Results

Registered in 2003
48.1% pass rate
from 772 tests in 2020
(11% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
    • 7.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.4% fail on Ball joint (89% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes (63% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Springs (88% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Coil springs (91% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Coil spring (92% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Mounting
    • 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.91% fail on Macpherson strut (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Direction indicators (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Flashing type (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.91% fail on Horn
      • 0.26% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (82% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.13% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (35% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance (88% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (88% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (93% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.26% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (45% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (88% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake discs (91% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.13% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.39% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.39% fail on Lever
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Servos
      • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.39% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission (47% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (48% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.65% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
      • 0.26% fail on Other body component
    • 0.39% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.39% fail on Door condition
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.26% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.13% fail on Carrier
    • 0.13% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.13% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 9.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.26% fail on Compression ignition (80% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.78% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.78% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts (84% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
    • 0.91% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end (54% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
        • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.65% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.52% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.52% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.91% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages