Citroen C2 MOT Results
Registered in 200345.6% pass rate
from 344 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2003 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C2 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Suspension
(45% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Springs
(99% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.29% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.29% fail on Linkage
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.5% fail on Ball joint
- 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.87% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.87% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.29% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.29% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.87% fail on Horn
-
0.58% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.58% fail on Position lamp
-
8.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
9.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
- 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
-
6.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.0% fail on Brake discs
-
0.87% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.87% fail on Brake pads
-
2.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.87% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.58% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.87% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.58% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.29% fail on Lever
- 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
9.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(54% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Transmission
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.7% fail on Joints
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.87% fail on Bumpers
-
0.58% fail on
Body
- 0.58% fail on Panel
-
0.29% fail on
Towbar
- 0.29% fail on Coupling
-
0.29% fail on
Doors
-
0.29% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.29% fail on Door condition
-
0.29% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.29% fail on Undertray
-
8.4% fail on
Visibility
- 6.1% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
- 0.29% fail on Driver's view
-
7.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.29% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.2% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.87% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.29% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.8% fail on
Tyres
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Steering
-
2.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
-
1.2% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.58% fail on Operation (33 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Steering rack
-
0.29% fail on
Power steering
- 0.29% fail on Operation
- 0.29% fail on Steering column
-
2.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.87% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.87% fail on Attachment
-
0.29% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.29% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C2 (2003 - 2010)
Low running costs, including insurance. Good crash test rating.