Citroen C1 MOT Results
Registered in 200968.4% pass rate
from 12,018 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C1 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(6.4% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Position lamps
(12% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Front lamps
- 0.62% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.033% fail on All position lamps
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.00% fail on
Headlamps
(62% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.0083% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.82% fail on
Hazard warning
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Switch (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Lamp (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Tell tale (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Direction indicators
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Flashing type
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Switch (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on Individual lamps (84% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.0083% fail on Switch
-
0.55% fail on
Flashing type
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.37% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.017% fail on Tell tale
- 0.11% fail on Horn (51% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Battery (55% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.0083% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(60% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Rear wheels (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Front wheels (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.067% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.017% fail on Brake operation
- 0.017% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Components
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Pipes (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Hoses
- 0.017% fail on Cylinders
- 0.017% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.058% fail on Leaks
- 0.017% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.0083% fail on Operation
-
3.9% fail on
Components
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Hub components
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads (16% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Brake discs (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Wheel cylinder (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.0083% fail on Brake linings
- 0.33% fail on Restricted movement (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake
(37% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Condition
- 0.083% fail on ABS (68% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Service brake control components
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Pedal
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Condition
- 0.0083% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.017% fail on
Pedal
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.0083% fail on Lever
- 0.0083% fail on Cable
-
0.0083% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0083% fail on Leaks
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth
- 2.8% fail on Condition (19% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Valve stem
- 0.050% fail on Size/type (67% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
6.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(21% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Wipers (58% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Washers
- 0.27% fail on Windscreen
- 0.17% fail on Mirrors
- 0.017% fail on Bonnet (84% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(22% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (22% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Attachment
- 0.0083% fail on Condition
-
0.72% fail on
Wheel bearings
(53% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Rear (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Front
-
0.25% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(90% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Linkage condition (76% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Front drive shafts
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Constant velocity joints (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.0083% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.0083% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.21% fail on
Front drive shafts
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Front suspension joints (69% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Shock absorbers
(87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.067% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Condition (99% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Location
- 0.058% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.017% fail on Condition
-
0.017% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.017% fail on Condition
-
0.0083% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.0083% fail on Condition
-
0.0083% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.0083% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(22% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Emissions (43% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.025% fail on
Fuel system
(87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Cap (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on System
-
0.67% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.55% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(60% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.017% fail on Requirements
- 0.017% fail on Attachment
-
0.55% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(60% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.38% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Attachment (89% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(37% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Registration plate (37% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Steering
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.100% fail on
Steering system
(91% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Ball joint
- 0.025% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Free play
- 0.017% fail on Steering rack
- 0.017% fail on Steering rack (89% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Power steering
- 0.058% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Operation
- 0.067% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Steering control
- 0.017% fail on Steering lock
- 0.0083% fail on Steering column
-
0.100% fail on
Steering system
(91% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Body condition
-
0.075% fail on
Doors
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Passengers other
- 0.0083% fail on Drivers
- 0.0083% fail on Passengers front
- 0.025% fail on Body security
-
0.0083% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.0083% fail on Chassis
-
0.0083% fail on
Seats
- 0.0083% fail on Passengers
-
0.0083% fail on
Load security
- 0.0083% fail on Bootlid
- 0.0083% fail on Spare wheel
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C1 (2005 - 2014)
Cheap to run. Group 1 insurance. 60mpg. handles well. Low list prices. Good Euro NCAP score. 2012 model emits just 99g/km CO2.