Citroen C-Crosser MOT Results

Registered in 2010

65.2% pass rate

from 535 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C-Crosser is unusually good or bad.

13% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 13% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 13% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
10% fail on Brakes
- 5.0% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 3.4% fail on Rbt
      - 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.37% fail on Decelerometer (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.93% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.37% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.19% fail on Rbt
      - 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 2.2% fail on Brake discs
  - 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.1% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.19% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.19% fail on Cable
- 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.75% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.56% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.37% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.37% fail on Lever
- 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.19% fail on Hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
6.7% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 2010 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.37% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Springs (79% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 1.1% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.56% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.37% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.37% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
6.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.7% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.56% fail on Headlamp levelling device
  - 0.56% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.37% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.19% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.19% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.19% fail on Individual direction indicators
5.2% fail on Visibility
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
3.7% fail on Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.2% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.19% fail on Noise suppression
  - 0.19% fail on Undertray
1.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.56% fail on Tank (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Body
  - 0.37% fail on Other body component
- 0.19% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.19% fail on Transmission
  - 0.19% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.19% fail on Joints
0.56% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.56% fail on Attachment
0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.37% fail on Registration plates
0.19% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp