Citroen C-Crosser MOT Results

Registered in 2010
66.0% pass rate
from 574 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C-Crosser is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Steering linkage components (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 14% fail on Track rod end (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
  • 9.6% fail on Brakes
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.70% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.70% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.35% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.17% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.17% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
  • 8.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.70% fail on Rear reflectors (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.17% fail on Horn
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.52% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.52% fail on Condition of glass (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Windscreen (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Suspension (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.87% fail on Suspension arms (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.35% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.17% fail on Springs
      • 0.17% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.17% fail on Coil spring
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.70% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.17% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.70% fail on Body, chassis, structure (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Spare wheel (31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.17% fail on Carrier
    • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.35% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages