MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » C-Crosser » 2008

Citroen C-Crosser MOT Results

Registered in 2008
57.2% pass rate
from 853 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C-Crosser is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (28% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Suspension arms (95% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.8% fail on Springs (37% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Coil springs (37% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Coil spring (37% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.59% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.23% fail on Axles
      • 0.23% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.23% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.35% fail on Decelerometer (20 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance (21 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (58% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.82% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt
          • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.70% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.59% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.35% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.35% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 12% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.82% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.82% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
  • 7.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (42% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.47% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.23% fail on Trailer electrical socket (19 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.12% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear
      • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (47% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Tank (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.59% fail on Spare wheel (52 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Carrier (64 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Spare wheel condition (41 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Joints (86% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
    • 0.35% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.12% fail on Catch
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 0.23% fail on Undertray
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Bracket
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (46% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (50% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Emission control equipment (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.12% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.35% fail on Spark ignition (90% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.23% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.12% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.12% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.94% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.94% fail on Attachment
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.59% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages