Citroen 2CV MOT Results
Registered in 198871.0% pass rate
from 483 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1988 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen 2CV is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(100% worse than other 1988 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(100% worse than other 1988 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 1988 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(100% worse than other 1988 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp
-
4.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.3% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 1988 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(180% worse than other 1988 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Main beam tell-tale (4 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.41% fail on
Electrical equipment
(80% better than other 1988 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.21% fail on Horn
-
0.21% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.21% fail on Position lamp
- 0.21% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
6.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(100% worse than other 1988 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.1% fail on
Transmission
-
3.1% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.9% fail on Joints
- 0.21% fail on Drive shaft
-
3.1% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
-
1.0% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.83% fail on Door condition
- 0.21% fail on Catch
-
0.21% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.21% fail on Door condition
-
1.0% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
1.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.62% fail on
Seats
- 0.41% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.41% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.41% fail on Pipe
- 0.41% fail on Floor
-
0.21% fail on
Body
- 0.21% fail on Other body component
-
3.1% fail on
Transmission
-
6.8% fail on
Suspension
-
2.3% fail on
Axles
(4 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 1.4% fail on King pins (15 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Stub axle
- 0.21% fail on Swivel joints/housing
- 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.83% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.62% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.41% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.21% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.21% fail on Other components
-
2.3% fail on
Axles
(4 times worse than other 1988 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Brakes
(39% better than other 1988 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.62% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.62% fail on
Rbt
- 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.62% fail on
Rbt
- 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.62% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.41% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.41% fail on Brake pads
-
0.21% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.21% fail on Brake discs
-
0.41% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.41% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.41% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.41% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.21% fail on Hand lever
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.21% fail on Lever
-
0.21% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.21% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.21% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.21% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.21% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.41% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.21% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Visibility
- 3.7% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Wipers
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(99% worse than other 1988 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
(99% worse than other 1988 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1988 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Requirements
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
(99% worse than other 1988 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Steering
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.2% fail on Track rod end
-
0.62% fail on
Other components
(6 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Steering component (9 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.21% fail on Steering column
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.7% fail on
Tyres
- 0.83% fail on Tread depth
- 0.41% fail on Size/type (6 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Condition
-
0.62% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.62% fail on Registration plates
-
0.21% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
- 0.21% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
-
0.21% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Condition