Citroen 2CV MOT Results
Registered in 198459.2% pass rate
from 142 tests in 2021
(36% worse than other 1984 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1984 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen 2CV is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 1984 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.70% fail on All direction indicators
-
5.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
5.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
5.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp
- 1.4% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.70% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.70% fail on Switch
- 0.70% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.70% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.70% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.70% fail on Battery(ies)
-
7.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
11% fail on
Suspension
-
5.6% fail on
Axles
(10 times worse than other 1984 cars)
- 4.2% fail on King pins (25 times worse than other 1984 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Axle
- 0.70% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.70% fail on
Springs
- 0.70% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.70% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.70% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.70% fail on Pipes
-
5.6% fail on
Axles
(10 times worse than other 1984 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.2% fail on
Transmission
-
4.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1984 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1984 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.70% fail on Joints
-
4.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1984 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.70% fail on Pipe
- 0.70% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.70% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.70% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.70% fail on
Body
- 0.70% fail on Body condition
-
0.70% fail on
Doors
-
0.70% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.70% fail on Door condition
-
0.70% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.70% fail on Floor
-
4.2% fail on
Transmission
-
7.7% fail on
Brakes
-
4.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.70% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
- 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
-
0.70% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
- 0.70% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
-
4.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.70% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.70% fail on Pedal
-
0.70% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.70% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
4.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.7% fail on
Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Washers
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.70% fail on Condition
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.4% fail on
Tyres
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth
-
0.70% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.70% fail on Registration plates