Chrysler Ypsilon MOT Results
Registered in 201266.3% pass rate
from 1,817 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Ypsilon is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(32% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Springs
(72% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Coil springs
(72% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Coil spring (73% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Coil springs
(72% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (65% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.055% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.61% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
-
0.94% fail on
Macpherson strut
(9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.66% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.28% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.17% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.055% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
7.5% fail on
Springs
(72% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (45% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.99% fail on
Headlamps
(57% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.055% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.77% fail on
Direction indicators
(54% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Flashing type
(54% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.055% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.77% fail on
Flashing type
(54% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.66% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.66% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.66% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.44% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.17% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.17% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.055% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.055% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
7.4% fail on
Brakes
(24% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake performance
(41% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(80% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.055% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.055% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
0.61% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.55% fail on
Rbt
- 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.055% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.055% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.55% fail on
Rbt
-
0.33% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.33% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.33% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(80% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(70% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs (71% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.55% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Cable (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(70% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake control
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.055% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.055% fail on Other components
-
3.7% fail on
Brake performance
(41% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
3.6% fail on
Visibility
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.7% fail on Washers
-
0.055% fail on
View to rear
- 0.055% fail on Mirrors
-
3.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(58% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.88% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.55% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.28% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.88% fail on
Fluid leaks
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Engine oil leaks (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.055% fail on Sound deadening material
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (95% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Transmission
(59% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Drive shafts
(57% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Joints (57% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Drive shafts
(57% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Doors
-
0.22% fail on
Driver's door
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.055% fail on Door condition
-
0.22% fail on
Driver's door
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Body
- 0.055% fail on Other body component
-
1.9% fail on
Steering
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.055% fail on Ball joint
-
0.33% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.22% fail on Steering rack
- 0.11% fail on Operation (21 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Power steering
- 0.055% fail on Operation
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.61% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.61% fail on Registration plates
-
0.44% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.055% fail on Requirements
- 0.055% fail on Condition
-
0.055% fail on
Airbags
- 0.055% fail on Drivers airbag
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chrysler Ypsilon (2012 - 2015)
Rebadged Chrysler version of the Lancia Ypsilon. 'Classy' interior. Soft ride.