MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Voyager » 2009

Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2009
71.7% pass rate
from 138 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.72% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.72% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.72% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.72% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.72% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 6.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 6.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.72% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 1.4% fail on Electronic stability control (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.72% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.72% fail on Reservoirs
  • 4.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.72% fail on Washers
  • 3.6% fail on Suspension (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.72% fail on Springs
      • 0.72% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.72% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.72% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.72% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.72% fail on Carrier
    • 0.72% fail on Doors
      • 0.72% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.72% fail on Door condition
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.72% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.72% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.72% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.72% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.72% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.72% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.72% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages