Chrysler Voyager MOT Results
Registered in 200956.2% pass rate
from 146 tests in 2017
(34% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Brakes
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 16% fail on Parking brake performance (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Rear wheels (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Front wheels (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
-
7.5% fail on
Hub components
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Brake pads (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Brake discs
-
1.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
1.4% fail on
Components
- 0.68% fail on Pipes
- 0.68% fail on Hoses
-
1.4% fail on
Components
- 0.68% fail on Restricted movement
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(51% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 10% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Position lamps
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Front lamps (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.68% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.68% fail on Headlamp
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Wipers (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Mirrors (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Windscreen
- 0.68% fail on Washers
-
7.5% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Valve stem
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension
-
3.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Front (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Rear
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.68% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.68% fail on Attachment
-
0.68% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.68% fail on Condition
-
3.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.68% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.68% fail on System
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
-
1.4% fail on
Steering system
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
-
1.4% fail on
Steering system
-
1.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.68% fail on
Doors
- 0.68% fail on Passengers other
-
0.68% fail on
Seats
- 0.68% fail on Drivers
-
0.68% fail on
Doors
-
0.68% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.68% fail on Attachment
-
0.68% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.68% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.68% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.68% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.68% fail on Condition
-
0.68% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems