Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.2% pass rate
from 146 tests in 2017
(34% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake performance (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Rear wheels (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Front wheels (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
    • 7.5% fail on Hub components (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Brake pads (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.4% fail on Components
        • 0.68% fail on Pipes
        • 0.68% fail on Hoses
    • 0.68% fail on Restricted movement
  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Front lamps (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.68% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.68% fail on Washers
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.2% fail on Suspension
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Front (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.68% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
  • 2.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.68% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on System
  • 1.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering system
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.68% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.68% fail on Seats
      • 0.68% fail on Drivers
  • 0.68% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.68% fail on Attachment
  • 0.68% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.68% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.68% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.68% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.68% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages