Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2008
54.7% pass rate
from 349 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (200% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 5.7% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.29% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.57% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic braking system
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.86% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.86% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.29% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.29% fail on Lever
    • 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 0.57% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.57% fail on Brake fluid (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (47% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp (80% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.57% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.86% fail on Springs (86% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Coil spring (85% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.57% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.57% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.57% fail on Chassis
      • 0.57% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.29% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.29% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.29% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.29% fail on Undertray
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.86% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.29% fail on Requirements
    • 0.86% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.29% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.29% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.86% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.86% fail on Attachment
  • 0.29% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages