Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2007
52.9% pass rate
from 327 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2007 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
          • 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2007 cars)
          • 0.92% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (7 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.31% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.31% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.31% fail on Cable
    • 4.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.61% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.31% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.31% fail on Pedal
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.31% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.92% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.92% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.31% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.9% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.31% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.31% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints
      • 0.31% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.31% fail on Joints
    • 0.92% fail on Spare wheel (50 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Carrier (59 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.61% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.31% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.31% fail on System
    • 0.31% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.31% fail on Bracket
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.31% fail on View to rear
      • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.92% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.92% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.92% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.31% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.92% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
    • 0.92% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment
  • 0.31% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.31% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.31% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages