MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Voyager » 2006

Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2006
48.9% pass rate
from 452 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 5.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.66% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.44% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.44% fail on Lever
    • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.44% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.22% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.22% fail on Servos
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (97% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.88% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.66% fail on Horn
    • 0.88% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.66% fail on Springs (87% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.22% fail on Leaf spring
      • 0.22% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.22% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.22% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.66% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.44% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 8.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Transmission
      • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.3% fail on Joints
        • 0.22% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.22% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.22% fail on Joints
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.88% fail on Chassis
      • 0.88% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.44% fail on Engine mounting (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on System
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.22% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 7.3% fail on Steering (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Steering linkage components (82% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.44% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
        • 0.22% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.22% fail on Locking devices
    • 2.7% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering box
    • 0.66% fail on Steering play (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Rams
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
  • 7.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.44% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.44% fail on View to rear
      • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (51% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.88% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.66% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition (76% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.44% fail on Non catalyst emissions (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Catalyst emissions (79% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.66% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.22% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.22% fail on Undertray
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
  • 0.66% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.66% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.66% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages