Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2005
48.3% pass rate
from 690 tests in 2020
(13% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.58% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.29% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.29% fail on Cable
    • 3.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.58% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.58% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.8% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.43% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 0.72% fail on Hazard warning (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.14% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.72% fail on Springs (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Leaf springs (95 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.14% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.29% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Coil spring (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.72% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
  • 8.1% fail on Steering (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
      • 0.29% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.14% fail on Rams
    • 0.87% fail on Steering play (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering column
  • 7.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Joints
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.58% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.58% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Tank
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
    • 0.29% fail on Chassis
      • 0.29% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.29% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.29% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.14% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.14% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.14% fail on Undertray
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.58% fail on View to rear
      • 0.58% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.43% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.29% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.14% fail on Window
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (47% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Spark ignition (50% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.58% fail on Catalyst emissions (72% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.43% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.14% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.14% fail on Undertray
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.87% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Airbags
      • 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.2% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 0.87% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages