Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2005
52.3% pass rate
from 861 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Individual lamps (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Tell tales
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.35% fail on All position lamps (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.12% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.81% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.46% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Horn
    • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.23% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 26% fail on Brakes (92% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.12% fail on Brake operation
    • 7.0% fail on ABS (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Components
        • 3.6% fail on Pipes
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.12% fail on Servos
      • 0.93% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Hub components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.81% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.23% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.46% fail on Pedal
        • 0.46% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.12% fail on Cable
    • 0.12% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
  • 11% fail on Suspension (41% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Front
      • 0.23% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front drive shafts (64% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (63% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.58% fail on Spring mounting (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.93% fail on Condition
    • 0.70% fail on Macpherson strut (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.35% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.12% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.12% fail on Shackle
    • 0.12% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.12% fail on Location
    • 0.12% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.5% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering system
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.58% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Free play
        • 0.46% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
        • 0.12% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Drive system
      • 0.12% fail on Rams
    • 0.23% fail on Steering control
      • 0.23% fail on Steering lock (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.58% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 3.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.93% fail on Emissions
    • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Cap
  • 2.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.93% fail on Body condition
    • 0.58% fail on Doors
      • 0.58% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.35% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
    • 0.23% fail on Spare wheel (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.12% fail on Chassis
  • 2.0% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.81% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.81% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages