Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2004
45.8% pass rate
from 463 tests in 2020
(16% worse than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Brakes (83% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 5.0% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.43% fail on Plate brake tester (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (19 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.22% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.22% fail on Cable
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.65% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.86% fail on Lever
    • 0.65% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Reservoirs (12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (27% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Headlamps (61% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Headlamp (57% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.65% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.65% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.65% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Horn
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.86% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (19 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (19 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 5.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.86% fail on Springs (78% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Leaf springs (146 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.22% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.65% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.43% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.7% fail on Joints
        • 0.22% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.86% fail on Chassis
      • 0.86% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.86% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Tank
      • 0.22% fail on Hose
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.86% fail on Engine mounting (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Bracket
    • 0.86% fail on Body
      • 0.65% fail on Other body component
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
    • 0.86% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Passenger's seat (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Towbar
      • 0.22% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.86% fail on Size/type
  • 8.2% fail on Steering (67% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.22% fail on Steering arm
    • 2.4% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Rams (37 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Steering play
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on View to rear (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Mirrors (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition (50% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.86% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.65% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.43% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.9% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.22% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.22% fail on Undertray
  • 5.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (86% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Airbags (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Drivers airbag (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.86% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.86% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages