MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Voyager » 2003

Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2003
46.8% pass rate
from 141 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 6.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Plate brake tester (29 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (61 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.71% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 8.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.71% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.71% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.4% fail on Lever
    • 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (59% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.8% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.71% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.71% fail on Switch
  • 26% fail on Suspension (52% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.1% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (29 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.71% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.71% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.71% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.71% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.71% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.71% fail on Size/type
  • 7.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
    • 0.71% fail on Seats
      • 0.71% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.71% fail on View to rear
      • 0.71% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.71% fail on Washers
  • 5.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.71% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.71% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.71% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.71% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.71% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 0.71% fail on Operation
      • 0.71% fail on Pump
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.71% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.71% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.71% fail on Anchorages
  • 0.71% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.71% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages