MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Voyager » 2002

Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2002
52.2% pass rate
from 69 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
    • 12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 12% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.9% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.4% fail on Lever
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 13% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 13% fail on Headlamp (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.3% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Joints
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 1.4% fail on Other body component
  • 5.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 1.4% fail on Other components
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested

Search Good Garages