Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2002
44.9% pass rate
from 392 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.6% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.51% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.26% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.26% fail on Lamp
  • 29% fail on Brakes (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 18% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Rear wheels (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.6% fail on Components
        • 5.4% fail on Pipes
        • 1.8% fail on Hoses
        • 0.26% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.77% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
      • 0.26% fail on Leaks
    • 5.4% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage
    • 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Component mounting (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Spring mounting (26 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 6.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.3% fail on Front (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.77% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on Axles
      • 0.26% fail on Axle beam
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.51% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 6.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.51% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 5.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.6% fail on Emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.51% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Hose
      • 0.26% fail on Cap
    • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.77% fail on Power steering
      • 0.77% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Steering control
      • 0.26% fail on Steering lock
  • 3.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition
    • 1.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.51% fail on Doors
      • 0.51% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.26% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.51% fail on Towbars (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Towbar
    • 0.26% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages