Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 1997
49.6% pass rate
from 113 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 17% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.88% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 7.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.88% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.88% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.88% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.88% fail on Switch
    • 0.88% fail on Battery
    • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.88% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.88% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.88% fail on Switch
      • 0.88% fail on Tell tale
  • 26% fail on Brakes (60% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 8.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 7.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 4.4% fail on Hub components
      • 3.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.8% fail on Components
        • 0.88% fail on Pipes
        • 0.88% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.88% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.88% fail on Pedal
        • 0.88% fail on Condition
    • 0.88% fail on ABS
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 7.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.5% fail on Spring mounting (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.88% fail on Couplings
    • 3.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.88% fail on Front
      • 0.88% fail on Rear
    • 0.88% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.88% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.88% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Mirrors (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.2% fail on Emissions
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.88% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition
    • 0.88% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.88% fail on Chassis
    • 0.88% fail on Body security
    • 0.88% fail on Seats
      • 0.88% fail on Drivers
  • 3.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.88% fail on Steering arm
  • 1.8% fail on Road Wheels (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.88% fail on Towbars
    • 0.88% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages