Chrysler Sebring MOT Results

Registered in 2009

61.4% pass rate

from 415 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Sebring is unusually good or bad.

14% fail on Brakes (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 3.9% fail on Electronic stability control (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Electronic braking system (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.2% fail on Rbt
      - 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.72% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.72% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.24% fail on Rbt
      - 0.24% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 2.2% fail on Brake discs
  - 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.72% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Hand lever
- 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
12% fail on Suspension
- 7.7% fail on Suspension arms (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 6.0% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.96% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.72% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.72% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.24% fail on Ball joint
- 0.96% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.96% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.72% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.48% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.48% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.48% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.24% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.24% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
9.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.7% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.4% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.48% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.48% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.48% fail on Horn
- 0.24% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.24% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
8.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.1% fail on Compression ignition (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 3.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.72% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 3.6% fail on Spark ignition
    - 3.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.48% fail on Noise suppression (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Undertray (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
6.3% fail on Steering (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Steering linkage components (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 5.1% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.48% fail on Steering rack
- 0.48% fail on Power steering
  - 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
  - 0.24% fail on Other components
- 0.24% fail on Electronic power steering
5.1% fail on Visibility
- 3.1% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
3.9% fail on Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.24% fail on Size/type
3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.24% fail on Condition
- 0.24% fail on Airbags
  - 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag
1.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.48% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.48% fail on Transmission
  - 0.48% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.24% fail on Drive shaft
    - 0.24% fail on Joints
- 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.24% fail on Sub-frame
    - 0.24% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.24% fail on Body
  - 0.24% fail on Other body component
- 0.24% fail on Doors
  - 0.24% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.24% fail on Door condition
0.24% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.24% fail on Speedometer
0.24% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Attachment