Chrysler Sebring MOT Results

Registered in 2009
62.5% pass rate
from 560 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Sebring is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Front lamps (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.18% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.18% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 11% fail on Tyres (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.3% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.3% fail on Suspension
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.71% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.89% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Rear
    • 0.54% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.18% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.18% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 9.3% fail on Brakes (43% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.71% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.54% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.3% fail on ABS (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.54% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Components
        • 0.36% fail on Hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Anti-slip
  • 5.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.36% fail on Emissions
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on System
    • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.89% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.18% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.18% fail on Body security
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages