Chrysler Sebring MOT Results

Registered in 2009
60.0% pass rate
from 438 tests in 2020
(4.7% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Sebring is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (6.5% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (15% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (3.6% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (6.3% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps (9.2% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp (5.0% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Side repeaters (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 12% fail on Suspension (13% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Suspension arms (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7.1% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joints (28% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (23% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.8% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.23% fail on Springs
      • 0.23% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.23% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.23% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (11% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (9.2% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (6.1% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance (0.81% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance (13% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (9.8% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance (33% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.46% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (15% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp) (13% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads (9.1% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (54% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.91% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Flexible brake hoses (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Rigid brake pipes (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
  • 8.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Compression ignition (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.23% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 3.7% fail on Spark ignition (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.91% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Other leaks
  • 7.5% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Washers (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear
      • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres (0.70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
      • 0.23% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
      • 0.23% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pipe
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.46% fail on Transmission (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Drive shafts (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Joints (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (25% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.23% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.23% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages