Chrysler Sebring MOT Results
Registered in 200857.2% pass rate
from 374 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Sebring is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
9.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(84% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.1% fail on
Other suspension component
(6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.80% fail on
Springs
(87% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(84% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
5.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
-
2.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.27% fail on Brake linings
-
2.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.1% fail on Brake discs
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.3% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.53% fail on Reservoirs (27 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
5.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.53% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.53% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.53% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.53% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.53% fail on Horn
-
7.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.27% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.80% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.80% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.1% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.80% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.53% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.27% fail on Other leaks
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.7% fail on
Steering
(150% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
-
0.80% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.80% fail on Steering rack
-
6.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.53% fail on Size/type
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
-
4.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Pipe (17 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Tank
- 0.27% fail on System
-
0.80% fail on
Doors
-
0.80% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.53% fail on
Transmission
(80% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Seats
- 0.53% fail on Driver's seat (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Bumpers
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.53% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.53% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.53% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
(58 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Speedometer (59 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.27% fail on Registration plates