Chrysler Sebring MOT Results

Registered in 2008
61.9% pass rate
from 664 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Sebring is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Front lamps (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (70% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.45% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.45% fail on Direction indicators (75% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Flashing type (75% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.15% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.30% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (30 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 9.2% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.90% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.75% fail on Front
      • 0.15% fail on Rear
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Front drive shafts (77% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Constant velocity joints (77% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Subframe mounting
  • 8.9% fail on Brakes
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (57% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.75% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.90% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.30% fail on Components
        • 0.30% fail on Hoses
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Leaks
    • 0.30% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.30% fail on ABS
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.15% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 0.15% fail on Restricted movement
  • 6.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.60% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.8% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Steering system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.30% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 3.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Pipe (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.45% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.45% fail on Seats
      • 0.45% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Body condition
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.60% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages