Chrysler PT Cruiser MOT Results
Registered in 200854.9% pass rate
from 122 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler PT Cruiser is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(72% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.82% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 0.82% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
5.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.3% fail on Brake pads
-
3.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 3.3% fail on Brake discs
-
0.82% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.82% fail on Lever
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
4.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Electronic stability control
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.6% fail on Lever
- 0.82% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.82% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
9.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.7% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.82% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (18 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Linkage (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.82% fail on Wheel bearings
-
9.8% fail on
Suspension arms
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.82% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.82% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.82% fail on Horn
-
6.6% fail on
Headlamps
-
9.0% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.82% fail on Steering rack
-
8.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.1% fail on Condition
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
-
4.9% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers
-
4.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.82% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.82% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.82% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.82% fail on Pipe
-
0.82% fail on
Transmission
-
0.82% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.82% fail on Joints
-
0.82% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.82% fail on
Seats
- 0.82% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.82% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
3.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.82% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.82% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.82% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.6% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.6% fail on Registration plates