Chrysler PT Cruiser MOT Results
Registered in 200254.8% pass rate
from 272 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler PT Cruiser is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Ball joint
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
7.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Linkage (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.74% fail on
Springs
(80% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.37% fail on Coil spring
-
0.37% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.37% fail on Torsion bar
-
0.37% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.37% fail on
Axles
- 0.37% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.37% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.37% fail on Macpherson strut
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
11% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 11% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.2% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (23 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
11% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
8.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
- 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
-
0.74% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.74% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.74% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.74% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.37% fail on Electronic stability control
- 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.37% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.37% fail on Hand lever
-
0.37% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.37% fail on Lever
- 0.37% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
8.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.2% fail on
Visibility
- 7.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers
-
0.37% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.37% fail on Window
-
7.0% fail on
Steering
-
5.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint
- 0.37% fail on Drag link end
-
0.74% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.74% fail on Steering rack
-
0.74% fail on
Power steering
- 0.74% fail on Other components
-
5.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.2% fail on
Transmission
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.2% fail on Joints
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.74% fail on
Chassis
- 0.74% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.74% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.37% fail on Tank
- 0.37% fail on Pipe
-
0.37% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.37% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.37% fail on
Body
- 0.37% fail on Panel
-
2.2% fail on
Transmission
-
5.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.37% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.37% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
4.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.74% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.37% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
4.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
-
1.5% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.5% fail on Registration plates
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.74% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.74% fail on Attachment