MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Neon » 2003

Chrysler Neon MOT Results

Registered in 2003
56.4% pass rate
from 78 tests in 2020
(4.1% better than other 2003 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Neon is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (16% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp (28% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps (29% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp (22% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators (59% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type (59% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (75 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (105 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 17% fail on Suspension (1.6% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Suspension arms (50% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint (97% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (1.7% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 1.3% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (65% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension rods
      • 1.3% fail on Suspension rod
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 15% fail on Brakes (6.4% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (84% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (86% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (13% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (11% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.3% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (37% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system (30% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Engine mounting (27 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Bracket (137 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.3% fail on Doors
      • 1.3% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition
    • 1.3% fail on Floor
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's seat
  • 9.0% fail on Steering (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Steering linkage components (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Track rod end (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility (3.6% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
  • 7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (1.0% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (29% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Spark ignition (17% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (28% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 2.6% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (28% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (37% worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 2.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plates (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages