MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Neon » 2003

Chrysler Neon MOT Results

Registered in 2003
45.7% pass rate
from 129 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Neon is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (97% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 7.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.78% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.78% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.78% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.78% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.78% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.78% fail on Other suspension component
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Switch
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.3% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Horn
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (30 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (45 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.78% fail on Position lamp
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 7.0% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 3.9% fail on Brake discs
    • 9.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.78% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt
          • 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 2.3% fail on Lever
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.78% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.78% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.78% fail on Brake fluid
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Engine mounting (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Engine mounting condition (18 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.78% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.78% fail on Transmission
      • 0.78% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.78% fail on Joints
    • 0.78% fail on Body
      • 0.78% fail on Panel
    • 0.78% fail on Doors
      • 0.78% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.78% fail on Door condition
    • 0.78% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.78% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 9.3% fail on Steering
    • 8.5% fail on Steering linkage components (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
  • 9.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.78% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.78% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.78% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.78% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Transmission oil leaks (42 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 7.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 7.0% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Attachment
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages