Chrysler Neon MOT Results
Registered in 200353.5% pass rate
from 185 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Neon is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Tell tale (50 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.8% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.54% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Position lamps
(85% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.54% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 0.54% fail on Horn
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 7.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.54% fail on Attachment
-
5.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.7% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Condition
- 0.54% fail on Attachment
-
3.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.8% fail on Component mounting
-
2.2% fail on
Sub-frames
(7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.54% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.54% fail on Condition
-
0.54% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.54% fail on Attachment
-
0.54% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.54% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.54% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.54% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension arms
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
9.7% fail on
Hub components
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.6% fail on Front wheels
- 0.54% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 2.7% fail on ABS
-
2.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.2% fail on
Components
- 1.1% fail on Pipes
- 1.1% fail on Hoses
-
2.2% fail on
Components
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
9.7% fail on
Hub components
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.7% fail on Wipers (89% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 0.54% fail on Bonnet
- 0.54% fail on Mirrors
-
9.2% fail on
Steering
-
8.1% fail on
Steering system
- 7.0% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Steering arm (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 0.54% fail on Pump
- 0.54% fail on Other components
-
8.1% fail on
Steering system
-
8.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Condition
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth
-
4.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.54% fail on Attachment
-
0.54% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.54% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.54% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.54% fail on Cap
-
2.2% fail on
Road Wheels
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate
-
1.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.54% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.54% fail on Body condition