Chrysler Neon MOT Results

Registered in 2003
53.5% pass rate
from 185 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Neon is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Tell tale (50 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.54% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps (85% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.54% fail on Horn
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 7.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment
    • 5.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment
    • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.8% fail on Component mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Sub-frames (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.54% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment
    • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.54% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.54% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.7% fail on Hub components (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.54% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on ABS
    • 2.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.2% fail on Components
        • 1.1% fail on Pipes
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 9.7% fail on Wipers (89% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.54% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.54% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.2% fail on Steering
    • 8.1% fail on Steering system
      • 7.0% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Steering arm (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.54% fail on Pump
      • 0.54% fail on Other components
  • 8.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Condition
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment
    • 0.54% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.54% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 3.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Cap
  • 2.2% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.54% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.54% fail on Body condition

Search Good Garages