Chrysler Neon MOT Results
Registered in 200250.3% pass rate
from 173 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Neon is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Tell tale (36 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Switch
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.3% fail on Battery
-
2.3% fail on
Position lamps
(68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front lamps (79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.2% fail on Horn
-
0.58% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.58% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.58% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.58% fail on
Flashing type
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
12% fail on
Suspension arms
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Condition
-
6.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.3% fail on Attachment (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.9% fail on Component mounting
- 0.58% fail on Subframe mounting
- 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.7% fail on Condition
-
0.58% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.58% fail on Condition
-
0.58% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.58% fail on Front
-
0.58% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.58% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.58% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.58% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
12% fail on
Suspension arms
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
6.4% fail on
Hub components
- 3.5% fail on Brake pads
- 3.5% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.7% fail on Front wheels
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.5% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Hub components
-
9.8% fail on
Steering
(98% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Power steering
- 0.58% fail on Other components
-
9.2% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.8% fail on Wipers
- 1.2% fail on Bonnet (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Windscreen
- 0.58% fail on Washers
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 0.58% fail on Size/type
-
5.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.8% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.9% fail on Emissions
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Chassis
- 1.2% fail on Engine mountings (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.58% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.58% fail on Attachment