Chrysler Neon MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.3% pass rate
from 173 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Neon is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Tell tale (36 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Switch
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Battery
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front lamps (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 0.58% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.58% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.58% fail on Individual lamps
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
    • 6.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Attachment (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.58% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.58% fail on Front
    • 0.58% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.58% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.58% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 6.4% fail on Hub components
      • 3.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 3.5% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 4.0% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 9.8% fail on Steering (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Power steering
      • 0.58% fail on Other components
  • 8.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Bonnet (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.58% fail on Washers
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Size/type
  • 5.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.8% fail on Seat belts (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis
    • 1.2% fail on Engine mountings (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.58% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.58% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages