Chrysler Neon MOT Results
Registered in 200058.0% pass rate
from 69 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Neon is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.3% fail on Ball joint
- 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 8.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 5.8% fail on Linkage (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
7.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Brake pads (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs
-
5.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Hand lever (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 1.4% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.4% fail on
Plate brake tester
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
7.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 1.4% fail on Door condition
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
1.4% fail on
Seats
- 1.4% fail on Driver's seat
-
5.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10% fail on
Tyres
- 5.8% fail on Condition
- 5.8% fail on Tread depth
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.9% fail on Track rod end
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.9% fail on
Visibility
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.4% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.4% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.9% fail on
Road Wheels
(8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 1.4% fail on Anchorages