Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results
Registered in 201365.0% pass rate
from 329 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Brakes
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (12 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
(7 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
(8 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
(8 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.61% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.61% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.61% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(96% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(110% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs
-
0.61% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Cable
- 0.30% fail on Lever
-
4.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(110% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Hand lever (10 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.30% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.30% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.0% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.91% fail on Headlamp
- 0.91% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (15 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.61% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.30% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.30% fail on Horn
-
3.0% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(8 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (15 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(8 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension
(75% better than other 2013 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.30% fail on
Springs
-
0.30% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.30% fail on Mounting
-
0.30% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.30% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.30% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
-
0.61% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
1.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.61% fail on
Doors
-
0.61% fail on
Other passenger's door
(10 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Door condition (11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Other passenger's door
(10 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.30% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.30% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.61% fail on
Doors
-
0.61% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.61% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.30% fail on Registration plates
-
0.30% fail on
Steering
-
0.30% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.30% fail on Steering rack
-
0.30% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.30% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.30% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chrysler Grand Voyager (2008 - 2015)
Large and comfortable with generous space for seven passengers. Excellent Stow & Go seats that fold flat into the floor. Well equipped as standard.