Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2012
68.5% pass rate
from 302 tests in 2017
(50% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Hub components (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Brake discs
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Rear wheels (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.66% fail on Electronic stability system (10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.33% fail on Components
        • 0.33% fail on Hoses
    • 0.33% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.33% fail on Components
        • 0.33% fail on Pipes
  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Flashing type (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Side repeaters (10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Battery (14 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.66% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.33% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 5.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
  • 4.3% fail on Suspension
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.99% fail on Location (60 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 0.66% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.33% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.33% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
  • 0.66% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.66% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pipe
      • 0.33% fail on System
  • 0.33% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.33% fail on Seats
      • 0.33% fail on Drivers
  • 0.33% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages