Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2012
67.4% pass rate
from 362 tests in 2020
(24% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (54% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.55% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.55% fail on Brake discs
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.28% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.28% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.55% fail on Washers
    • 0.28% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.9% fail on Suspension
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.55% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.55% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.28% fail on Springs
      • 0.28% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.28% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 2.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.83% fail on Undertray (27 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Pipe
      • 0.28% fail on System
    • 0.28% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.28% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.28% fail on Carrier
    • 0.28% fail on Body
      • 0.28% fail on Other body component
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.28% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition
    • 0.28% fail on Seats
      • 0.28% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.55% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.28% fail on Airbags
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages