Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2011
68.5% pass rate
from 362 tests in 2017
(28% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (96% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Direction indicators (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Flashing type (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 8.8% fail on Side repeaters (17 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.28% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.55% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Battery
  • 12% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Hub components (180% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake calipers
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.83% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Restricted movement (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.28% fail on Components
        • 0.28% fail on Pipes
      • 0.28% fail on Leaks
    • 0.28% fail on ABS
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (19 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.83% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2011 cars)
  • 4.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.28% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.8% fail on Suspension
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.55% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.28% fail on Location
    • 0.55% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.28% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.28% fail on Front
    • 0.28% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
  • 0.55% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Pipe
      • 0.28% fail on System
  • 0.28% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.28% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.28% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages