MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Grand Voyager » 2011

Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2011
61.8% pass rate
from 435 tests in 2020
(25% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (66% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Side repeaters (10 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.69% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.23% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 17% fail on Brakes (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 9.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 5.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (85% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.69% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
      • 0.23% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.46% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.46% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.23% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 5.3% fail on Suspension
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.92% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.23% fail on Axles
      • 0.23% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.23% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.23% fail on Springs
      • 0.23% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.23% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (190% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.69% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.69% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.46% fail on Engine mounting (26 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Engine mounting condition (38 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Doors
      • 0.46% fail on Other passenger's door (10 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition (11 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Transmission
      • 0.23% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.23% fail on Joints
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's seat
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
  • 0.92% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.92% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 0.69% fail on Steering
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
    • 0.23% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages