MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Grand Voyager » 2011

Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2011
64.6% pass rate
from 401 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 5.0% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.25% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.25% fail on Cable
        • 0.25% fail on Lever
    • 0.50% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.50% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.25% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Servos
    • 0.25% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.50% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 5.5% fail on Suspension (51% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.25% fail on Axles
      • 0.25% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.25% fail on Springs
      • 0.25% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.25% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.25% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.2% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.00% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.00% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.5% fail on Visibility
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.75% fail on Washers
    • 0.25% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.25% fail on View to rear
      • 0.25% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 2.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.25% fail on System
    • 0.50% fail on Transmission
      • 0.50% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.50% fail on Joints
    • 0.50% fail on Seats (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Driver's seat (14 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.25% fail on Carrier
    • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.25% fail on Body
      • 0.25% fail on Other body component
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
  • 1.00% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.00% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.75% fail on Steering
    • 0.50% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.75% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.50% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment
  • 0.25% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.25% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages