Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results
Registered in 201168.5% pass rate
from 362 tests in 2017
(28% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(96% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Flashing type
(7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Side repeaters (17 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Flashing type
(7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Position lamps
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
-
0.55% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.55% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.28% fail on Battery
-
8.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Hub components
(180% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Brake calipers
-
5.0% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Front wheels
- 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.83% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.83% fail on Condition
- 0.55% fail on Restricted movement (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.28% fail on
Components
- 0.28% fail on Pipes
- 0.28% fail on Leaks
-
0.28% fail on
Components
- 0.28% fail on ABS
-
7.5% fail on
Hub components
(180% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (19 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.83% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2011 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.55% fail on Windscreen
- 0.28% fail on Mirrors
-
2.8% fail on
Suspension
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.55% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Location
-
0.55% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.28% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.28% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.28% fail on Front
-
0.28% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.28% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.55% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.28% fail on Pipe
- 0.28% fail on System
-
0.55% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.28% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.28% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.28% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chrysler Grand Voyager (2008 - 2015)
Large and comfortable with generous space for seven passengers. Excellent Stow & Go seats that fold flat into the floor. Well equipped as standard.