MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Grand Voyager » 2010

Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.3% pass rate
from 331 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.30% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.30% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.30% fail on Cable
    • 0.91% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.91% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.60% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.60% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 7.3% fail on Suspension (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.60% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Axles
      • 0.30% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.6% fail on Visibility
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.91% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Other passenger's door (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Door condition (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
    • 0.30% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.30% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.30% fail on Carrier
    • 0.30% fail on Body
      • 0.30% fail on Other body component
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.30% fail on Undertray
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.91% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.60% fail on Steering
    • 0.30% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.30% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.30% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages