Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.3% pass rate
from 337 tests in 2020
(14% worse than other 2010 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Side repeaters (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (18% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.30% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 17% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 5.9% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.0% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.59% fail on Plate brake tester (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance (62 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (6.0% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (3.9% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (24% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 6.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Brake pads (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Rod
        • 0.30% fail on Linkage
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Electronic stability control (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.59% fail on Flexible brake hoses (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 8.0% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (11% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (4.0% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (3.0% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Springs (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs (50% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Coil spring (57% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Mounting
    • 0.89% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Shock absorbers (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Spark ignition (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (2.4% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on View to rear (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Mirrors (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth (21% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.30% fail on Steering column
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.89% fail on Body, chassis, structure (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Pipe
    • 0.30% fail on Towbar
      • 0.30% fail on Coupling
    • 0.30% fail on Transmission
      • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Joints
    • 0.30% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.30% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 0.89% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages