MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Grand Voyager » 2009

Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.9% pass rate
from 377 tests in 2021
(18% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 6.1% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.80% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.27% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.27% fail on Lever
    • 2.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Electronic stability control (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.53% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.53% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.80% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.80% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.3% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Springs (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Coil spring (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.80% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.53% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.53% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 6.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.8% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.27% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.27% fail on Sound deadening material
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.27% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on View to rear
      • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.6% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Other passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Driver's door (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
    • 0.80% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe
      • 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.27% fail on System
    • 0.53% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.27% fail on Body
      • 0.27% fail on Panel
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.53% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages