Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results
Registered in 200959.7% pass rate
from 347 tests in 2017
(24% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(72% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 11% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Stop lamp (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.29% fail on Tell tale
- 0.86% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.58% fail on Headlamp
-
0.29% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.29% fail on Horn
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Front wheels
- 0.86% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.58% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Hub components
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Brake calipers (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake discs
-
1.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
1.2% fail on
Components
- 0.86% fail on Hoses (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.29% fail on Leaks
-
1.2% fail on
Components
- 1.2% fail on Electronic stability system (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.58% fail on ABS
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension
(41% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Location
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.86% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.58% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.29% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.29% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.29% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.29% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
4.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
- 0.86% fail on Washers
- 0.58% fail on Windscreen
- 0.58% fail on Mirrors
- 0.29% fail on Bonnet
-
1.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.58% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.86% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.58% fail on System (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Pipe
- 0.58% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.86% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.86% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.86% fail on Registration plate
-
0.58% fail on
Steering
-
0.29% fail on
Steering system
- 0.29% fail on Track rod end
-
0.29% fail on
Power steering
- 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.29% fail on
Steering system
-
0.58% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.29% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.29% fail on Body condition
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chrysler Grand Voyager (2008 - 2015)
Large and comfortable with generous space for seven passengers. Excellent Stow & Go seats that fold flat into the floor. Well equipped as standard.