MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Grand Voyager » 2009

Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.6% pass rate
from 431 tests in 2020
(20% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Position lamp (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.23% fail on Horn
    • 0.46% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 21% fail on Brakes (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 9.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.46% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.23% fail on Cable
        • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.70% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.23% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.46% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.70% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.6% fail on Suspension (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.93% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.70% fail on Springs (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Coil springs (84% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.23% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.93% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Pipe (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.23% fail on System
    • 0.93% fail on Transmission
      • 0.93% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.93% fail on Joints
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.23% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.23% fail on Body
      • 0.23% fail on Other body component
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.93% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.93% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.23% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.23% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages