Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results
Registered in 200857.5% pass rate
from 701 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Brakes
(100% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
4.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Plate brake tester
(15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (27 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.71% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
0.43% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.43% fail on Cable
-
4.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.14% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(29% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Stop lamp (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(150% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(150% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.00% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.71% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Horn
-
0.86% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.86% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.86% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.29% fail on Position lamp
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(31% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.4% fail on
Springs
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Coil spring (66% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Leaf springs
(357 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (1218 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.86% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.14% fail on Linkage
- 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.14% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
-
4.9% fail on
Suspension arms
-
5.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
(7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.29% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
(7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Transmission
-
1.6% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.6% fail on Joints
-
1.6% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.71% fail on Exhaust system (69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.43% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.29% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.57% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.43% fail on
Chassis
- 0.43% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.29% fail on
Body
- 0.14% fail on Panel
- 0.14% fail on Other body component
- 0.29% fail on Undertray (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Airbags
(10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.14% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.29% fail on Catalyst emissions (84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.14% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.14% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.6% fail on
Visibility
(43% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 1.00% fail on Washers (69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Steering
(63% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.86% fail on Track rod end
-
0.14% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack
-
0.86% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.71% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.71% fail on Attachment
-
0.57% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.57% fail on Registration plates
-
0.14% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
- 0.14% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chrysler Grand Voyager (2008 - 2015)
Large and comfortable with generous space for seven passengers. Excellent Stow & Go seats that fold flat into the floor. Well equipped as standard.