Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2008
55.4% pass rate
from 845 tests in 2020
(11% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.12% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.83% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn
      • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.71% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.24% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 19% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.36% fail on Plate brake tester (13 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (19 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (18 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (33 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.83% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.36% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.24% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Cable
    • 3.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.59% fail on Lever
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.71% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 8.2% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (67% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.83% fail on Springs (83% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.24% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 6.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.0% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Other passenger's door (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.7% fail on Joints
    • 0.83% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on System
      • 0.12% fail on Hose
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.71% fail on Exhaust system (66% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Engine mounting condition (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.24% fail on Undertray
    • 0.12% fail on Chassis
      • 0.12% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
  • 4.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.71% fail on Washers (75% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on View to rear
      • 0.47% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.24% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2008 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition (49% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.36% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Other leaks (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.12% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 3.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.24% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Pump
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages