Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2008
57.2% pass rate
from 789 tests in 2017
(16% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Position lamps (84% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Front lamps (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.7% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Individual lamps (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 7.2% fail on Stop lamp (83% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.13% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.0% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.63% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.13% fail on Horn
  • 20% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.6% fail on Hub components (83% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.5% fail on ABS (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Electronic stability system (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.0% fail on Components
        • 0.76% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Pipes
    • 0.89% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.89% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.13% fail on Cable
  • 8.0% fail on Suspension (41% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (52% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.51% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Drive shafts (74% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Front drive shafts (74% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Constant velocity joints (74% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.25% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.13% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.13% fail on Shackle
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering system
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.25% fail on Free play
        • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Passengers other (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers
  • 1.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.63% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.63% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Cap
      • 0.25% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.63% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.63% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.63% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
  • 0.89% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.63% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.63% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages