Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2006
53.1% pass rate
from 2,256 tests in 2020
(7.1% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 5.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.66% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.089% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.089% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance (45% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.089% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (48% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (51% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (50% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.71% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Pivot
    • 4.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control (200% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.58% fail on Hand lever (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake fluid (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Servos (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.40% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.31% fail on Air and vacuum systems (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Servos (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Operation
      • 0.044% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.13% fail on Rigid brake pipes (95% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators (59% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type (59% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.089% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.044% fail on Switch
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.71% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.089% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms (29% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (54% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (44% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Linkage ball joints (48% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.089% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Springs (68% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Coil spring (78% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Leaf springs (143 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (454 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (681 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.66% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.58% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.044% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.27% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.044% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.089% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.044% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.044% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.5% fail on Steering (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Steering linkage components (77% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end (77% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.044% fail on Steering arm
    • 2.1% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Steering box
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Rams (18 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.089% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.49% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.044% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers (37% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (61% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres (24% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (32% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Transmission
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.3% fail on Joints
      • 0.27% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.27% fail on Joints
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.31% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.089% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.35% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.35% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.31% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.27% fail on Chassis
      • 0.27% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.089% fail on Bracket
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.089% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.044% fail on Hose
      • 0.044% fail on Pipe
    • 0.18% fail on Undertray
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
    • 0.089% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.089% fail on Spare wheel condition (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Body
      • 0.089% fail on Other body component
    • 0.044% fail on Load security
      • 0.044% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.044% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (42% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition (51% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.35% fail on Catalyst emissions (81% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Emissions not tested (83% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (63% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.044% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.044% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.044% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.62% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.089% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.089% fail on Requirements
  • 0.66% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.58% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.53% fail on Attachment
    • 0.044% fail on Condition
  • 0.044% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.044% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages