Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2005
52.4% pass rate
from 1,755 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.68% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.23% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.057% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.057% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.91% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 5.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.97% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Pedal
    • 0.85% fail on Rigid brake pipes (70% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.057% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.057% fail on Servos
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (16% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.11% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (38% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.057% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.91% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.74% fail on Wheel bearings (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Springs (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Leaf springs (37 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.057% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.17% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.057% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.11% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Axle
    • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.057% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 5.6% fail on Steering (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Steering arm (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.057% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Operation
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Rams (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility (27% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on View to rear
      • 0.40% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.28% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 5.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (38% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Transmission (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (41% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Joints (40% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Halfshafts
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.57% fail on Other passenger's door (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.57% fail on Body
      • 0.46% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.28% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.057% fail on Chassis
      • 0.057% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.057% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.057% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.057% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.057% fail on Carrier
    • 0.057% fail on Towbar
      • 0.057% fail on Other towbar components
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (37% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Spark ignition (43% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (60% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.057% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.057% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.40% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.057% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.57% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Airbags (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.63% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.63% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages