Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2005
53.2% pass rate
from 1,933 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (16% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Direction indicators (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual lamps (57% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
      • 0.052% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.052% fail on Tell tales
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.052% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.052% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.8% fail on Battery (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.98% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
      • 0.10% fail on Lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 25% fail on Brakes (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.47% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake operation
    • 5.4% fail on ABS (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.052% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.7% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Fitment
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Components (58% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.47% fail on Pipes (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.052% fail on Leaks
    • 0.36% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.26% fail on Cable
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage
      • 0.052% fail on Lever
    • 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
        • 0.10% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.052% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.052% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.052% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
  • 11% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (37% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts (48% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Front drive shafts (47% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (46% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.88% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.72% fail on Front
      • 0.16% fail on Rear (83% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.36% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Leaf springs (129 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (159 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Shackle (171 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Spring eye
    • 0.21% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition (96% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.052% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.052% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment
  • 7.5% fail on Steering (87% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Steering system (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Free play (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Other components
        • 0.052% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.10% fail on Rams (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.052% fail on Steering operation
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres (19% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
    • 0.052% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (25% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.88% fail on Washers (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.7% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.16% fail on Seat belts (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Requirements
      • 0.052% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (63% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Emissions (67% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.31% fail on Cap
      • 0.052% fail on Pipe
      • 0.052% fail on System
    • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.62% fail on Body condition
    • 0.31% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Body security
    • 0.052% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.052% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.052% fail on Chassis
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages