MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Grand Voyager » 2005

Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2005
54.4% pass rate
from 1,214 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.082% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.66% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.082% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.082% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.082% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.082% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.082% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.082% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.58% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (77% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.58% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.41% fail on Cable
        • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Rigid brake pipes (86% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.082% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.082% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.082% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.082% fail on Servos
    • 0.082% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.082% fail on Reservoirs
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Horn
      • 0.082% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Hazard warning (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.082% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.082% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Suspension (25% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.99% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.082% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.082% fail on Linkage
      • 0.082% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.99% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.99% fail on Springs (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Leaf springs (89 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (422 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.41% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.33% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.082% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Steering linkage components (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Steering arm (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Other components
        • 0.082% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.16% fail on Pump (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Operation
      • 0.082% fail on Rams
    • 0.33% fail on Steering play
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (31% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Joints
      • 0.082% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.082% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (63% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.49% fail on Body
      • 0.33% fail on Other body component
      • 0.082% fail on Body condition
      • 0.082% fail on Panel
    • 0.33% fail on Chassis
      • 0.33% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Carrier (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.082% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.082% fail on Door condition
      • 0.082% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.082% fail on Door condition
    • 0.082% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.082% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.082% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.082% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.082% fail on Seats
      • 0.082% fail on Driver's seat
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility (32% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.66% fail on Washers (82% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on View to rear
      • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.25% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (35% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (35% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition (40% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.99% fail on Catalyst emissions (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.082% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.25% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.082% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.74% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Airbags
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.91% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.74% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.66% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages