Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2004
51.8% pass rate
from 1,345 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (48% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.0% fail on Front lamps (30% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.074% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.15% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps (69% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.074% fail on Tell tales
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.0% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.89% fail on Tell tale (12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Horn
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Lamp
    • 0.074% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.074% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 26% fail on Brakes (73% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Rear wheels (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.3% fail on ABS (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Hub components (63% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Brake pads (77% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.22% fail on Brake calipers
    • 5.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.8% fail on Components
        • 3.6% fail on Pipes
        • 1.5% fail on Hoses
      • 0.37% fail on Leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
    • 2.3% fail on Parking brake (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.45% fail on Cable
      • 0.074% fail on Lever
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal
        • 0.37% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.074% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.074% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.074% fail on Locking devices
  • 17% fail on Suspension (16% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.074% fail on Condition
    • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Component mounting (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (16 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (59% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front drive shafts (60% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (60% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.074% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.89% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.82% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.67% fail on Front
      • 0.15% fail on Rear (85% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Location
    • 0.30% fail on Leaf springs (151 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (282 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Anchor (660 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.074% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.074% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.074% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 8.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.67% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.074% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres (28% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Free play
        • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.074% fail on Other components
        • 0.074% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Operation
      • 0.074% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.074% fail on Rams
    • 0.22% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.074% fail on Locking devices
  • 4.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.074% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas (81% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (75% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Vehicle structure (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.074% fail on Drivers
      • 0.074% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers
      • 0.074% fail on Drivers
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.074% fail on Body security
  • 2.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (60% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Emissions (72% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Cap
      • 0.22% fail on System
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.074% fail on Hose
      • 0.074% fail on Pipe
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Condition
  • 0.89% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.074% fail on Towbars
    • 0.074% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages