MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Grand Voyager » 2004

Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2004
52.1% pass rate
from 582 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Brakes (94% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 15% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.34% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.86% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
    • 0.52% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.34% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (77% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.17% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.69% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.34% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.34% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.52% fail on Suspension arm
    • 6.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.69% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Springs (60% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Leaf springs (208 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (753 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (627 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.52% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Coil spring (88% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.86% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.52% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.17% fail on Suspension rod
  • 8.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.2% fail on Transmission
      • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.2% fail on Joints
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system (68% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Seats
      • 0.52% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.52% fail on Engine mounting (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Boot lid (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Boot lid condition (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Tank
    • 0.17% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Other body component
    • 0.17% fail on Floor
    • 0.17% fail on Undertray
  • 8.4% fail on Steering (86% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Drag link end
    • 2.6% fail on Steering gear (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other components (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.52% fail on Steering play
      • 0.52% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.17% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.17% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.9% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on View to rear (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Airbags
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages