Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2003
45.8% pass rate
from 456 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2003 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes (80% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.88% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.66% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.22% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.3% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Lever
        • 0.22% fail on Relay lever
    • 5.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
      • 0.22% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.44% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.22% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.22% fail on Servos
  • 23% fail on Suspension (39% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (21 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs (173 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (407 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.88% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.88% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Hazard warning (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Joints
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Body
      • 0.44% fail on Other body component
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Tank
    • 0.44% fail on Spare wheel (23 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Spare wheel condition (51 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.66% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.22% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.22% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 2.4% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Transmission oil leaks (19 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (70% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.88% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.66% fail on Power steering
      • 0.66% fail on Rams (33 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages