Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2002
52.1% pass rate
from 482 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Brakes (85% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.83% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.83% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (94% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (95% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.83% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.83% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
    • 0.83% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.62% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.62% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Flashing type (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Horn
      • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.62% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.83% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.83% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.83% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Springs (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.41% fail on Other suspension component (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.41% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.3% fail on Joints
    • 0.83% fail on Chassis
      • 0.83% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.62% fail on Body
      • 0.62% fail on Other body component
    • 0.62% fail on Doors
      • 0.62% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.62% fail on Door condition
    • 0.41% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.41% fail on Spare wheel (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.21% fail on Carrier
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on System
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on View to rear (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.83% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.83% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Operation
    • 0.83% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.83% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.21% fail on Steering play
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.83% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.83% fail on Attachment
  • 0.62% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages