Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2002

54.3% pass rate

from 210 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

20% fail on Brakes (45% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 13% fail on Brake performance (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 3.3% fail on Rbt
      - 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.95% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.4% fail on Rbt
      - 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 4.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 4.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.4% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.9% fail on Brake discs
- 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.48% fail on Hand lever
- 0.48% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.48% fail on Lever
- 0.48% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.48% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
18% fail on Suspension
- 9.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.95% fail on Ball joint
- 2.4% fail on Springs
  - 1.4% fail on Leaf springs (314 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.95% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (945 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.48% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
  - 0.95% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.48% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.48% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.8% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.9% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.95% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Electrical wiring
  - 0.48% fail on Horn
- 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.95% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.95% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.48% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.48% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.95% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.48% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.48% fail on Position lamp
- 0.48% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.48% fail on Switch
- 0.48% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.48% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.4% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Transmission
  - 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.95% fail on Joints
    - 0.48% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.48% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.48% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.48% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.48% fail on Tank
- 0.48% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.48% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.48% fail on Body
  - 0.48% fail on Body condition
- 0.48% fail on Seats
  - 0.48% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.48% fail on Cabs
  - 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.48% fail on Undertray
8.1% fail on Visibility
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 3.8% fail on Washers
- 0.48% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.48% fail on Windscreen
- 0.48% fail on View to rear
  - 0.48% fail on Mirrors
5.7% fail on Steering
- 2.4% fail on Steering gear
  - 2.4% fail on Steering rack
- 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 1.4% fail on Power steering
  - 0.95% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Pump
- 0.95% fail on Steering play (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.95% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.4% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.48% fail on Condition
3.8% fail on Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Spark ignition
    - 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.95% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.95% fail on Transmission oil leaks (26 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Engine oil leaks
2.9% fail on Road Wheels (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Condition
0.95% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.95% fail on Registration plates