Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2000
44.3% pass rate
from 212 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 31% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 24% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 13% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.8% fail on Components
        • 3.3% fail on Pipes
        • 0.47% fail on Hoses
      • 1.4% fail on Leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (35% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 14% fail on Headlamp aim (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Headlamps (96% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.47% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.47% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.6% fail on Battery (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.47% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.47% fail on Tell tales
    • 1.4% fail on Horn
    • 0.47% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.47% fail on Attachment
    • 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.2% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.4% fail on Spring mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.94% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.94% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
    • 0.94% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.94% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.47% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.47% fail on Front
  • 13% fail on Steering (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Steering system (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.8% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.94% fail on Pump (24 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Other components
      • 0.47% fail on Operation
  • 9.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.94% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
  • 6.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions (78% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Tank
      • 0.47% fail on Cap
    • 0.94% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 2.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.47% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 0.94% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.47% fail on Drivers
    • 0.47% fail on Body security
    • 0.47% fail on Body condition
  • 0.47% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.47% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages