Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results
Registered in 200050.9% pass rate
from 57 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Brakes
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
8.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 1.8% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
-
3.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
- 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
-
14% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 3.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
1.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.8% fail on Servos
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 8.8% fail on Headlamp
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
(5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Horn (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Battery(ies)
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
8.8% fail on
Headlamps
-
12% fail on
Visibility
- 7.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.5% fail on Washers
-
1.8% fail on
Condition of glass
- 1.8% fail on Windscreen
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.8% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 1.8% fail on Macpherson strut
- 1.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
11% fail on
Steering
-
7.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 7.0% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.8% fail on Steering rack
-
1.8% fail on
Steering play
- 1.8% fail on Steering rack
-
7.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.8% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.8% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
1.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions