Chrysler Crossfire MOT Results
Registered in 200360.0% pass rate
from 160 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Crossfire is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 8.1% fail on Headlamp
-
6.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.63% fail on All direction indicators
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.63% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.9% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
8.1% fail on
Headlamps
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
6.9% fail on
Springs
-
6.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.9% fail on Coil spring
-
6.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (18 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.63% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.63% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.63% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.63% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.9% fail on
Springs
-
9.4% fail on
Brakes
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
-
0.63% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.63% fail on Brake discs
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.5% fail on
Brake performance
(68% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.9% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Electronic braking system
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.3% fail on Pedal
-
0.63% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.63% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.63% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.63% fail on Other components
-
6.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Emission control equipment
(18 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Catalytic converter (26 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.63% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.63% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
5.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
-
5.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 5.0% fail on Track rod end
-
0.63% fail on
Steering play
- 0.63% fail on Steering box
-
5.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.63% fail on
Chassis
- 0.63% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.63% fail on
Seats
- 0.63% fail on Driver's seat
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
4.4% fail on
Visibility
- 3.1% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Washers
-
1.3% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.3% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)