Chrysler Crossfire MOT Results

Registered in 2003

55.6% pass rate

from 196 tests in 2020

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Crossfire is unusually good or bad.

24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 8.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 8.2% fail on Headlamp
- 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 6.1% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 6.1% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
    - 4.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 2.0% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.51% fail on All direction indicators
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.1% fail on Position lamps
  - 3.1% fail on Position lamp
- 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.0% fail on Horn
19% fail on Suspension
- 9.7% fail on Springs (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 9.7% fail on Coil springs (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    - 9.7% fail on Coil spring (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.0% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.0% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.0% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.51% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
11% fail on Brakes
- 5.1% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.0% fail on Rbt
      - 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
  - 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.0% fail on Rbt
      - 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.51% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.5% fail on Brake discs
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.51% fail on Pedal
  - 0.51% fail on Hand lever
- 1.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.0% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.51% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas
    - 0.51% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
8.7% fail on Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.0% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
7.7% fail on Tyres
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth
- 3.6% fail on Condition
5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 5.1% fail on Spark ignition
    - 5.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
4.6% fail on Steering
- 4.6% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 3.6% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.51% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.51% fail on Steering arm
4.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.5% fail on Transmission
  - 1.5% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    - 1.0% fail on Prop shaft (43 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    - 0.51% fail on Flexible couplings
- 0.51% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.51% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.51% fail on Seats
  - 0.51% fail on Driver's seat
0.51% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.51% fail on Registration plates
0.51% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.51% fail on Speedometer
0.51% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.51% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp