Chrysler 300C MOT Results

Registered in 2012
69.9% pass rate
from 113 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler 300C is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (16 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Parking brake performance (20 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Rbt (21 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 5.3% fail on Parking brake performance (20 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.88% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.88% fail on Rbt
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.4% fail on Brake discs and drums (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake discs (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.88% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.88% fail on Hand lever
  • 8.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.88% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.88% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.88% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
  • 5.3% fail on Suspension
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.88% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.88% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.88% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.88% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.8% fail on Seats (38 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Driver's seat (61 times worse than other 2012 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages