Chrysler 300C MOT Results

Registered in 2010
65.1% pass rate
from 86 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler 300C is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 4.7% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Electronic stability control (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Other components
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 7.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission
      • 2.3% fail on Prop shafts (44 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Flexible couplings (1153 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.2% fail on Visibility
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages