Chrysler 300C MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.2% pass rate
from 79 tests in 2020
(22% worse than other 2010 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler 300C is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 25% fail on Brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 23% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (70 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (16% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (5.9% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads (6.8% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.3% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 14% fail on Suspension (17% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (22% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (15% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (11% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (12% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
  • 6.3% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility (0.27% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres (21% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (1.7% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition (12% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission
      • 1.3% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.3% fail on Flexible couplings
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages