Chrysler 300C MOT Results

Registered in 2009
69.5% pass rate
from 95 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler 300C is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.1% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 6.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 3.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 3.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.1% fail on Cable
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 1.1% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 8.4% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.2% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  • 5.3% fail on Steering
    • 5.3% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear
      • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages